|
Is
Cyberfeminism Colorblind?
Continued: The weak links of cyberfeminism to feminism and cyberfeminists' refusal to engage with differences rooted in materiality have been recognized as problematic by various artists and theorists including CAE, Faith Wilding, Caroline Bassett, Coco Fusco, Susanna Paasonen, Irina Aristarkhova and myself and have resulted in other cyberfeminist initiatives. The collective subRosa, founded by Wilding in 1999, engaged issues of race, digital and reproductive technologies since its inception. The recent list Undercurrents initiated by Fusco and hosted by Aristarkhova, Fusco, Wilding and myself attempted to create a space where issues relevant to women of color could be discussed. Cyberfeminista, a list originating from Mexico City, seems unaware of problems in previous cyberfeminisms but the content of the discussions is much more varied than other cyberfeminist lists including among its subjects visual arts, literature, history, sociology, gender and sexuality, international and local feminist activism. Recently, a manifesto and invitation to an anti-racist border crossing camp by a group of German feminists was posted on several electronic mailing lists.9 The manifesto urges participants to examine their own attitudes to whiteness and race. It remains to be seen whether these efforts will result in more inclusive and politically active cyberfeminisms. 1. The question of why many women found Cyberfeminism alienating was raised at the opening session of the Very Cyberfeminist International held in Hamburg, December 2001. 3.
Technics of Cyberfeminism <mode=message> edited by Claudia Reiche and Andrea Sick. Bremen: Thealit, Frauen, Kultur, Labor
2002 and Yvonne Volkart, "Connective
Identities," Catalogue essay of the Internet and CD-ROM part of the show, Double life. Identity and transformation in contemporary art. Vienna:Generali Foundation 2001.
<< Return to Cyberfeminism Introduction |